Analysis : G20 Delivers Zero Solutions

G20.jpg
The G20 sum­mit of the world’s largest 20 economies con­cluded on 16 Novem­ber in Bris­bane, Aus­tralia, with the sum­mit com­mu­nique deliv­er­ing only bad news on the global econ­omy. The final sum­mit com­mu­nique high­lighted: “But the global recov­ery is slow, uneven and not deliv­er­ing the jobs needed. The global econ­omy is being held back by a short­fall in demand, while address­ing sup­ply con­straints is key to lift­ing poten­tial growth. Risks per­sist, includ­ing in finan­cial mar­kets and from geopo­lit­i­cal ten­sions. We com­mit to work in part­ner­ship to lift growth, boost eco­nomic resilience and strengthen global insti­tu­tions.”[1] The global eco­nomic cri­sis has now reached its sev­enth anniver­sary and whilst eco­nomic col­lapse has been averted, wealth mald­is­tri­b­u­tion, wel­fare cuts, unem­ploy­ment and gov­ern­ment debt con­tin­ues to halt any eco­nomic recov­ery. British Prime Min­ster David Cameron issued a stark mes­sage: “the red warn­ing lights are flash­ing on the dash­board of the global econ­omy.”[2] The G20 nations col­lec­tively account for 85% of the world econ­omy, 80% of world trade and 60% of the worlds population,[3] but despite this it has failed to solve the global eco­nomic cri­sis. There are four key rea­sons for this failure.
Firstly, the US econ­omy is the world’s largest by far, rep­re­sent­ing 22% of annual global eco­nomic out­put. The col­lapse of the sub­prime mar­ket in the US dragged the global econ­omy down with it due to its sheer size. All attempts to kick start the US econ­omy con­sis­tently run out of steam with the US econ­omy con­stantly going into reces­sion.  The world’s largest econ­omy began 2014 with its econ­omy shrink­ing nearly 3% in the first quar­ter, but the fail­ure of the US econ­omy to sus­tain a health recov­ery 7 years after the finan­cial cri­sis exposes fun­da­men­tal flaws in the world’s largest econ­omy. Whilst the US econ­omy did grow for the remain­der of the year a closer exam­i­na­tion shows the fac­tors dri­ving growth are arti­fi­cial and not sus­tain­able. UShouse­hold expen­di­ture, con­sumer expen­di­ture, in fact all met­rics of spend­ing are barely ris­ing. In June 2014 var­i­ous US banks announced that America’s total debt had reached $60 tril­lion! This level of debt is more than the value of goods and ser­vices pro­duced by all the coun­tries in the world put together. This is a stag­ger­ing sit­u­a­tion for the world’s super­power and is not sus­tain­able. With all this debt the ques­tion is how has the US grown dur­ing the peri­ods it did over the past few years? The main dri­ver of the US econ­omy has been the Fed­eral Reserve stim­u­lus pro­gram, which has pumped over $3 tril­lion into the econ­omy. Attempt­ing to kick start eco­nomic growth with stim­u­lus was merely a high-octane boost and a tem­po­rary mea­sure. They are designed to kick-start stalled economies, not to fuel sus­tained eco­nomic growth. The growth that has been achieved is just the inflated results of stim­u­lus achiev­ing its intended effect of being tem­po­rary. In 2013 the US offi­cially changed the way it mea­sured the econ­omy, it changed how it mea­sured growth and for the first time included intel­lec­tual prop­erty such as music pro­duc­tion and drug patents. The effect of this added $370 bil­lion to the econ­omy which was a change of 2.5%.[4]
Sec­ondly, the global eco­nomic cri­sis cre­ated a sov­er­eign debt cri­sis in Europe and this exposed the debt dri­ven nature of the union. Ger­many has how­ever led the solu­tion to the cri­sis in Europe by intro­duc­ing con­trols on the fis­cal sys­tems of EU mem­ber states as well as restric­tions on their national bud­gets. Ger­many imposed aus­ter­ity as the only way to resolve the cri­sis on the con­ti­nent and kept out any other poten­tial solu­tions. This meant Euro­pean nations would need to cut their bud­gets and bal­ance their books. Aus­ter­ity has made the cri­sis worse because in the mid­dle of an eco­nomic cri­sis Euro­pean nations are not spend­ing but cut­ting expen­di­ture. When the eco­nomic cri­sis began in 2008 con­sumers cut spend­ing and com­pa­nies laid off staff and also cut spend­ing and halted plans for expan­sion due to the neg­a­tive eco­nomic cli­mate. In this envi­ron­ment gov­ern­ments across the con­ti­nent also cut spend­ing, so no seg­ment of the econ­omy was spend­ing. Mod­ern west­ern economies depend on spend­ing, it is spend­ing that cre­ates jobs and incomes and in turn incomes cre­ate spend­ing. If for one rea­son or another, the pri­vate sec­tor or busi­nesses reduce their spend­ing, then total spend­ing can only be kept up by the gov­ern­ment increas­ing its own spend­ing. But Euro­pean gov­ern­ments cut spend­ing in the name of reduc­ing debt and national deficits and this has dragged the whole econ­omy down as no seg­ment of the econ­omy is spend­ing and gen­er­at­ing eco­nomic activity.
Thirdly, the Euro­pean Union has seen some growth for short peri­ods due to the use of an uncon­ven­tional tool called Quan­ti­ta­tive Eas­ing (QE). This is the print­ing of money and pump­ing it into the national econ­omy, which a coun­try with its own money cre­at­ing cen­tral bank can do. As inter­est rates are at vir­tu­ally zero per­cent across the EU using the inter­est rate to encour­age bor­row­ing and spend­ing ceased to be effec­tive and this was where directly print­ing money and pump­ing this into the econ­omy i.e. QE was utilised. But QE had failed to gen­er­ate eco­nomic activ­ity and as a result the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank (ECB) announced on 5 June 2014 that it was impos­ing neg­a­tive inter­est rates of –0.1% on euro­zone banks who place reserves in their accounts held by the ECBThis unique sit­u­a­tion meant banks would be charged rather than paid inter­est on money they held in their accounts.[5] The defi­ciency of QE is that it only has a tem­po­rary effect of mak­ing the econ­omy grow but once this money works through the sys­tem the econ­omy ends up in the same place it started. In the UK, the gov­ern­ment spent over £375 bil­lion (around 30% of the econ­omy) on QE and it has been a key tool to revive the econ­omy. This money was pumped into the Lon­don Stock Exchange (rather than to ordi­nary citizens),[6] even though only 5% of the UK wealth­i­est own 40% of the shares on the stock mar­ket! For every new pound that was cre­ated only 8p trick­led down into the real econ­omy, the rest remained in the par­al­lel finan­cial sector.[7] QE cre­ated an arti­fi­cial but tem­po­rary sit­u­a­tion, but its infla­tion­ary effects remain permanent.
Fourthly, Whilst the global econ­omy has seen some growth ever since the global eco­nomic cri­sis began back in 2007, this has been largely dri­ven by emerg­ing economies such as Brazil, Rus­sia and India and not nations such as the US, China or Ger­many. The emerg­ing nations, between them have accounted for 75% of total growth in the world econ­omy over the past five years.[8] These nations in 2014 saw their economies run out of steam as they were being dri­ven by min­eral resource min­ing or basic goods man­u­fac­tur­ing, which was cheaper than any­one else. On its own this was never organic or sus­tain­able. This is why global eco­nomic recov­ery has been slow and choppy as the world’s advanced economies have strug­gled to grow. The global sys­tem cur­rently oper­ates on the west­ern economies import­ing from cheaper emerg­ing economies, who in turn export such goods that gen­er­ate other eco­nomic activ­ity in the West. For the moment West­ern economies are strug­gling to grow, which is being com­pounded by aus­ter­ity and stim­u­lus. Emerg­ing economies  replaced exports to the West with their own tem­po­rary mea­sure, but. In 2014 these tem­po­rary mea­sures crum­bled. Rus­sia is marred in eco­nomic cri­sis, China’s eco­nomic model of low wages and exports has gone as far as it can and Bei­jing is now focus­ing on inter­nal con­sump­tion to drive eco­nomic growth. Japan, Ger­many, France and Italy are all in reces­sion. The top 10 tril­lion dol­lar economies of the world are all strug­gling to grow. This is why talk of a rebal­anc­ing in the global econ­omy is now out of the question.
After 7 years, the under­ly­ing fac­tors that led to the global eco­nomic cri­sis still remain. Although the fall in the global econ­omy is slow­ing, the global econ­omy is not improv­ing. Although sta­tis­tics and data indi­cate some level of eco­nomic growth, when unem­ploy­ment, bor­row­ing and lend­ing, pro­duc­tion and wages are analysed these all con­tinue to fall even if GDP is improv­ing. Whether it’s the G7 or G20 both have failed to resolve the cri­sis. The solu­tions they have applied only had the tem­po­rary effect of stop­ping the cri­sis tem­porar­ily, but not end­ing the cri­sis. That is why every time the global econ­omy grows, very quickly growth turns into reces­sion. The only way to resolve this cri­sis is through wealth being dis­trib­uted across the world more equi­tably and within the world’s largest economies. But the heart of the cur­rent global eco­nomic prob­lem is the fact that the rich­est 9% of the world own over 80% of global wealth![9]


0 comments: